This Asia Cup has been a blockbuster, a treat for cricketing fans. The underdogs, Sri Lanka, went on to win the second edition of T20 Asia Cup. In between, there were plenty of mouth-watering contests that sparked the interest of the fans.
Like other tournaments, this Asia Cup also had some particular trends. Here is a list of few:
Toss played a crucial part
Akin to the 2021 T20 World Cup, the United Arab Emirates played a very important role in the Asia Cup 2022 (from the start of group stage). In the WC, teams winning the toss had won 66.7 percent of the games (26 out of 39 in UAE). Similarly, in this Asia Cup, teams had a win percentage of 61.5 percent.
Out of the 13 matches played, in 12 games, teams had opted to field first after winning the toss. Bangladesh in their match against Afghanistan in Sharjah, were the only ones to bat first. Out of those 12, teams chasing went on to win eight matches with a win percentage of 66.7 percent. In seven matches since the start of the Super four’s, Pakistan in the finals and Afghanistan against India, were the only teams to lose after winning the toss.
Sri Lanka won the title despite losing the toss. Before the final, the Island nation won four matches on the bounce. In all four, they had won the toss and elected to field. India and Bangladesh had won the toss only once throughout the Asia Cup.
Cliffhanger chases irrespective of target
Apart from the final, Hong Kong’s two defeats and Afghanistan’s demoralizing defeat against India, all were wins by chase. In the nine remaining successful chases, the first match between Sri Lanka and Afghanistan was the only one that produced a quick result (Target of 106 chased in 10.1 overs by Afghanistan).
Remaining eight went down the wire irrespective of the target. To elaborate more, six of those chases were achieved in the last over of the innings. Sri Lanka’s three wins out of the four via chase were won in the last over. Against India, chasing 174, they chased it with one ball remaining.
Pakistan’s two wins through chase, were also nail-biting finishes. The most memorable one perhaps would be the match against Afghanistan, rather than against India. Their win against India was off the penultimate ball of the innings. However, against Afghanistan, with their number 10 and 11 batsmen at the crease, Pakistan smashed two sixes off the first two balls to gun down 11 runs in the last over. They won that match with one wicket and four balls to spare.
India’s only win through a chase came against Pakistan. That match also went down the wire as India chased it with two balls to spare, showing how close this tournament was.
Pacers found success while bowling back of length or short
With pace and bounce on offer, especially in Dubai, fast bowlers didn’t hesitate to bowl the bouncers. Overall, 29.9 percent of the wickets (26 out of the 87 wickets), came when pacers bowled on back of a length or short. They had picked up a wicket every 14 balls from this length. Only when bowled Yorkers, the balls/dismissal ratio was better (10.4).
In Dubai, the numbers were even better in terms of strike rate. The pacers had bagged 20 wickets (29.1 percent) combined from back of a length and short deliveries. As far as the strike rates are concerned, pacers had picked up a wicket every 14.3 balls from back of a length and 9.0 when bowled short.
The middle over phase between 7-10, a difficult scoring stage
For most of the competition, the pitch produced some belters for batting. That is why, in 12 innings, a total of 170+ were witnessed. However, most of those have been because of the good start and finish.
In the middle overs, especially in the four overs after the powerplay, the scoring was difficult. Throughout this tournament, teams had scored at 7.4 in the powerplay, 7.7 in between overs 11-15 and 10.5 in the last five overs.
But, in between over 7-10, the scoring rate dropped to 6.3. A boundary was witnessed every 11.8 balls in between 7-10 overs as compared to 7.7 in between overs 11-15.
Even on a true pitch like Dubai, the fate was the same. In this phase, teams had scored 6.6 runs per over and had hit a boundary every 10.3 balls. Whereas, in no other phase, the run rate and the balls/boundary ratio were under or above 7.5.
Finger spinners thrived better economically
When it was about picking up wickets, the wrist spinners and pacers were in charge. But, when it was about containing runs, the finger spinners did the job for their team.
The wrist spinners had picked up 30 wickets at a balls/wicket ratio of 18.3, only the pacers had a better bowling strike rate (17.4), but they conceded 7.2 runs per over. In comparison, the finger spinners had bagged 35 wickets at a balls/wicket ratio of 24.3, the worst, but had an economy of 6.4, the lowest.
Pacers impressed in the first over, spinners prospered in their last over
Throughout this Asia Cup, there were plenty of occasions in which the pacers picked up a wicket in their first over. On the other hand, spinners bagged most of their wickets in the last over.
Though their bowling strike rate was better in the fourth over (12.5), in terms of wickets percentage, most of their wickets came in the first over. The pacers picked up 26 wickets in their first over, which is 29.9 percent of the wickets.
In comparison, spinners in both aspects, bowling strike rate and wickets percentage were best in their last over. They picked up a wicket every 14.2 balls and their 32.3 percent of wickets came in their final over.