back icon
08 Oct 2020 | 10:05 AM
No need to tinker but can allow two bouncers per over in T20 cricket: Gavaskar
Gavaskar said, "The iconic figure did put forth a few suggestions which could be seriously considered by the lawmakers of the game"

The legendary Sunil Gavaskar believes that T20 cricket doesn't need much tinkering as it is in "pink of health" but custodians of the game can consider allowing two bouncers per over, moving ahead.

The shortest format, over the years, has witnessed dominance of batsmen across the globe with bowlers having little to play for on flat decks with short boundaries.

Does he foresee see a rule change to ease the pressure off bowlers?

"The T20 game is doing very well and there's no need to tinker with it," Gavaskar told PTI during an exclusive interview from the UAE where he is working as a broadcaster for the Indian Premier League.

But the iconic figure did put forth a few suggestions which could be seriously considered by the lawmakers of the game.

"It is loaded heavily in favour of the batsmen for sure. So, give a fast bowler two bouncers per over and yes the boundaries can be easily longer, if the ground authorities want it," he said.

"Also look at giving an extra over to the bowler who takes a wicket in his first three overs. But seriously there's no need to bring any changes at all," the 71-year-old opening great added.

Talking about rules, Gavaskar suggested that the TV umpire should be empowered to check whether a non-striker is backing up too far even before a bowler has delivered the ball.

So, why haven't the custodians of the game thought about penalising the batsman, who is stealing three to five yards by backing up too far at the non-striker's end?

"There is a penalty of being dismissed if the bowler runs out the non-striker who is moving out of the crease before the ball is delivered," Gavaskar said.

But he feels that if TV umpire finds that the non-striker is backing up too far, even if there is a boundary, it should be ruled "one short" as a penalty.

"Now that the TV umpire is also checking if the bowler has overstepped for no balls, he should be able to see if the non-striker has left the crease before the ball is released and if he has, then if runs are taken, it can be called one short even if a boundary or four is hit. This should act as a deterrent," Gavaskar said.

Gavaskar has consistently objected to the use of the term "Mankading" as he believes it is an insult to one of India's greatest cricketers late Vinoo Mankad.

Mankad ran Bill Brown out at the non-striker's end for backing up too far during a Test match between India and Australia in 1948.

While Australian captain Sir Donald Bradman had declared that Mankad was perfectly right and acted within the rules, the media Down Under of that era referred to the dismissal as "Mankading".

The legend put things in perspective as to why it is so legitimately objectionable to say 'Mankading'.

"I don't know about it being deliberately ingrained in us but out of all the so-called unsportsmanlike acts on the cricket field, this mode of dismissal is the only one that has been given a name.

"With all the talk about doing away with terms like 'Chinaman' and 'French cut' because it's politically incorrect, it's about time this disparaging term is dumped in the bin too," he said.

Gavaskar also lauded senior off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin, who gave a warning to Aaron Finch for backing up too far during an IPL game between Delhi Capitals and RCB but also made it clear that he wouldn't spare the batsman the next time.

"Ashwin is one of the most astute of cricketers. By this gesture, he has shown respect and regard to his coach Ricky Ponting, who has expressed his displeasure at this sort of dismissal.

"However, he has also announced publicly that this is the final warning and if from now on anybody strolls out of his crease then he should be prepared to walk back to the dug-out," he concluded.

Indian Premier League, 2020IndiaSunil GavaskarRavichandran Ashwin
Related Articles
'First and last warning of 2020,' says Ashwin as he refrains from 'Mankading'
The incident happened in the third over of RCB's innings, when the Australia opener stepped way out of his crease
06 Oct 2020
Ashwin and I are on same page: Ponting on running out non-strikers
Ashwin and Ponting have had an open discussion here over the mode of dismissal and by the former Australian captain's own admission, they have reached a common ground
09 Sep 2020
Ponting wants run penalties not 'Mankads' for 'cheating' batsmen
India's Ravichandran Ashwin sparked a worldwide debate last year with his "Mankading" of England batsman Jos Buttler in a Twenty20 Indian Premier League match
03 Sep 2020
Don't invoke spirit of cricket in run-outs at non-striker's end: ICC match referee Srinath backs bowlers
Srinath does not feel that the bowler is wrong if he runs out a batsman in this fashion
01 Sep 2020
Bowlers should get 'free ball' in case non-striker backs up too far: Ashwin
The off-spinner's suggestion is similar to the concept of free hit
24 Aug 2020
Ponting says he will not allow Ashwin to ''Mankad'' during upcoming IPL
The senior Indian bowler had defended his act at that time, saying it was within the rules of the game
19 Aug 2020
Mankading: Let the non-striker beware
This mode of dismissal came into the limelight once again during the ongoing U-19 World Cup
Garfield Robinson
03 Feb 2020
Need to think beyond Dhoni going into T20 World Cup: Gavaskar
The former Indian captain feels Rishabh Pant or Sanju Samson are the next best options
20 Sep 2019
Ashwin has no regrets on Mankading
Off-spinner defends his actions
05 Apr 2019
Cricketing greats back Kohli over his comments on no-ball post MI defeat
With 7 needed off the final over, the umpires failed to pick no-ball by Malinga
02 Apr 2019
Cricket like never before
Term of use
Privacy Policy
Cookies Policy
Follow us on
@ 2020 | All rights reserved